Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis"
Results 21 - 40
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Right now, Nebraska (along with Maine) does not allocate presidential electors in a winner-take-all fashion. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
The Court consolidated the cases Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
” Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:12 am
Davies, (Not Yet) Taking Rights Seriously: The House of Lords in Begum v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and… [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:19 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:47 am
Davis, the Equal Protection Clause, as in Plessy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Davis 8. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
” Miller–Davis Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
Davis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
La. 1988), aff'd, 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Maine: Porter v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:38 am
Davis Law Review titled "Reverse-Commandeering. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:02 am
Zorach v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
In the latest ruling, Davis v. [read post]
