Search for: "State of Maine v. Dunn"
Results 21 - 40
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
Collier are very similar to those of Dunn v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in American Legion/Maryland National-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
State enforcers remain active. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm
For example, in Whitmey, the FTT stated: “Ms Dunn’s evidence was […] weak on the harm said to arise from disclosure of the particular letter with which we are concerned. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:56 am
Just before his arrest, in Simpson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
Dunn. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am
There is also a case (Reichman & Dunn v Beveridge & Gauntlett from 2006), admittedly involving a commercial tenancy but at the moment it applies to residential tenancies, which says that if a tenant wants to leave early, a landlord has no duty to ‘mitigate’ his losses and will be entitled to continue to demand the rent from the tenant – even if they are no longer living there – on a month by month basis. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am
There is also a case (Reichman & Dunn v Beveridge & Gauntlett from 2006), admittedly involving a commercial tenancy but at the moment it applies to residential tenancies, which says that if a tenant wants to leave early, a landlord has no duty to ‘mitigate’ his losses and will be entitled to continue to demand the rent from the tenant – even if they are no longer living there – on a month by month basis. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In Kokesh v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Dunn, the court found that Alabama had denied a death-penalty defendant the expert mental-health assistance to which he was entitled under the standard the court established in Ake v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
The justices issued an opinion yesterday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]
