Search for: "State v Richardson" Results 21 - 40 of 1,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
This led the court to consult applicable precedent in Richardson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am by SHG
  See United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
Richardson found that the Maryland law fails the tw0-part Bruen test from the 2021 US Supreme Court case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
Judge Quattlebaum dissented, joined by Judges Agee, Richardson, and Rushing. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division noted the letter was addressed to the IG urging the commencement of an investigation and said that in reviewing the full context of the communication, "including its tone and purpose," it concluded that Defendant "set out the basis for [her] personal opinion, leaving it to the [IG] to evaluate it for [herself]", citing Brian v Richardson, 87 NY2d 46 [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division noted the letter was addressed to the IG urging the commencement of an investigation and said that in reviewing the full context of the communication, "including its tone and purpose," it concluded that Defendant "set out the basis for [her] personal opinion, leaving it to the [IG] to evaluate it for [herself]", citing Brian v Richardson, 87 NY2d 46 [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
In Marreco v Richardson (1908) 2 KB 584, the Court of Appeal had found In other words, if a man pays his tailor’s bill by cheque and the cheque is accepted as payment, the tailor cannot sue for his account until the cheque has been presented and dishonoured. [read post]