Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 21 - 40
of 631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 5:00 pm
A draft of the Amars' article is here and below (with the Amars' permission) is a taste of their powerful analysis.The Court’s rulings in Bush v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:56 am
” As Akhil Amar, Vik Amar and Steve Calabresi explain in their must-read amicus brief in Moore, however, Article I’s Election Clause didn’t originate with the Constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Amar, Vikram David Amar, Windsor v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
As promised in this earlier post, Amaral v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm
New Vik Amar piece, forthcoming in the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
Amar’s approach also renders much of Section 2 of the Amendment superfluous. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
Daniel SokolHere in the sunshine state, we have not forgotten Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:50 pm
VIKRAM DAVID AMAR AND MICHAEL SCHAPS With many eyes this week on the Ninth Circuit litigation challenging President Trump’s Executive Order regulating entry into the U.S. by nationals of seven Middle Eastern and African countries, less noticed but potentially as important is a separate lawsuit (San Francisco v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:43 pm
Vik Amar and Jason Mazzone suggest that the Court grant cert. pronto in Huffman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:01 pm
(Perhaps South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
