Search for: "State v. Bake"
Results 21 - 40
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 12:38 pm
I baked some Lawffice Links for the occasion:First, check out the SCOTUSblog page for Sebelius v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
Law Lessons from LOCAL BAKING PRODUCTS, INC. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83 (30 June 2011) Appeal from: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 723 See also: Innovation Patents Flop Like Stunned Mullet Infringement – claim construction – functional claim – whether ‘includes a pivotally moveable floor’ encompasses a mechanism in which this element is insufficient to perform a claimed function – meaning of ‘to allow’ … [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:12 am
” Wood v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:12 am
” Wood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:01 pm
" [AP; State Farm v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am
On September 29, 2020, in the case of Bookfinders Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners, the Irish Supreme Court held, among other issues, that the bread used in Subway sandwiches did not fall within the definition of bread as a staple food under Irish tax laws due to a high percentage of sugar and fat in the ingredients and was thus not subject to the zero percent tax rate. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Runyon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:05 am
In Blair v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:58 am
" In Erving v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
This was because, although the appellants had appealed to the Court of Appeal by way of case stated, they were entitled to appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the 1988 Order because the decision involved a question as to the validity of measures of the Northern Ireland Assembly. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:12 am
Case Name: Mary's Bake Shoppe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 2:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
Covington v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
