Search for: "State v. Barbar"
Results 21 - 40
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 2:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to review a case, Panetti v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Upadhyay v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Knauff v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case, “McCall v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case, “McCall v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:46 pm
We were happy to learn on Tuesday that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a death penalty case, Baze v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:26 am
It's by John Wagner.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
It may be my bias, but it strikes me as barbaric. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 7:07 am
The states have followed this logic in death penalty cases. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:12 pm
The Supreme Court sent an important message when it ruled in Roper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
” But: The policy contained an endorsement stating that the policy “is hereby amended by the deletion of the [Regulatory] Exclusion. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
Five years ago, in Morales v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
It's a barbaric kind of thing ... but there are some states where it's just more acceptable. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
The states have followed this logic in death penalty cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm
Joseph DeLee, a preeminent 20th century obstetrician and fervent opponent to midwifery, stated in a much-quoted 1915 speech, “Progress Toward Ideal Obstetrics”: The midwife is a relic of barbarism. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:05 pm
In doing so, this Article draws upon Supreme Court jurisprudence, including the landmark Furman v. [read post]
