Search for: "State v. Bassett" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:35 pm by Howard Bashman
” Laura Bassett of HuffPost has a report headlined “Republicans Are Pretending They Don’t Care If SCOTUS Overturns Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:06 pm
  If we really had a rule that treated seriously the Ninth Circuit's principle about trees (or receipts) falling in the forest where no one hears (or steals) them, I think we might well have to strike down a plethora of federal and state statutes that we're super happy with and that we commonly think reflect legitimate interests. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by Jessica Bassett
Some dialogue participants stated that an excellent regulator should have at least one designated Aboriginal representative on its board, in addition to an adequate number of culturally sensitive staff members who are dedicated to reaching out to Aboriginal communities. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Although Trooper offered explanations “for some of the many discrepancies” in his testimony, the Appellate Division said that “this created a credibility question which was resolved against him” and substantial evidence supports the administrative determination.As to the penalty imposed by the Superintendent, the court said “we have observed that ‘a State Trooper holds a position of great sensitivity and trust and a higher standard of fitness and… [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
All of this tended to justify the subsequent authorities – R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett (1983) 10 HLR 125; R v Brent LBC ex p Awua; R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia; R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda (1997) 30 HLR 76; R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi (1997) 30 HLR 473 – in which different acts were said to have broken (or had the potential to break) the chain of causation from the earlier… [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]