Search for: "State v. Bellamy" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Gideon
Sure enough, there is one other, just a floor below the Cheshire spectacle: State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:19 am by Adam Wagner
As Judge Bellamy pointed out, there are hundreds of thousands of people in Coventry. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am by Giles Peaker
Nor is there anything in Bellamy’s case (Bellamy v Hounslow LBC (2006) EWCA Civ 535;) (a case where there were appeals against an original decision of 4 August 2004 and against a decision on review out of time on 15 November 2004) to suggest that the review decision under appeal was a nullity, as is suggested by the decisions in Muloko and Khamassi. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As such, it marks an  important contribution to the field that should be read by newcomers and old hands alike." -- Alex Bellamy, Griffith University, Australia More information is available here. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am by admin
Garrison, 47 Cal. 3d 746 (1989)), are suspended immediately after trial for poor mental health and would have been suspended prior to but for false promise to secure co-counsel (Bellamy v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:35 am
No crime of attempted voluntary manslaughter Alex Bellamy v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]