Search for: "State v. Blatt"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
" For that proposition, the Court cites Blatt v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 7:53 pm
In its recent decision in the case of Barnes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 10:32 am
ShareYou might have expected the justices to take a breather the day after hearing the weighty arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am
The plaintiff’s conclusory allegation that the defendants intended to deceive the court and the plaintiff in relying on the affirmative defense of release in the claim denial action was not sufficient to state a cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d at 698; Kupersmith v Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc., 38 AD3d 847, 848). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Next week’s argument in Marx v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Having tackled gene patenting yesterday, today the Justices returned to the bench to hear oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
” Though Blatt insisted that her interpretation rested directly on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnett Bank v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
In fact, the interpretation about how ICWA is a balancing statute between two sovereigns, the state and the tribe may not be all that persuasive to the Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
” “Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Pasternack v Laboratory Corp.… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
Recently, Lisa Blatt dedicated substantial time in the Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Anthony Nicholas OrbanOriginal Article There appears to be more to this story than what is being reported, see the video below. 04/27/2012 West Hollywood (PRWEB) - Jury selection began today in People of the State of California v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
" Further, said the court, "The fact that causes of action may be stated separately, invoke different legal theories, or seek different relief will not permit relitigation of claims," citing Pondview Corp. v Blatt, 95 AD3d 980.The test applied to determine if an action is ripe for application of the doctrine of res judicata is a pragmatic one, involving an analysis of how the facts are related as to time, space, origin or motivation, whether they form a… [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
“A cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 must be pleaded with specificity” (Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; see Long Is. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
