Search for: "State v. Blowers" Results 21 - 40 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
See Julia Homer & David Katz, WorldCom Whistle-blower Cynthia Cooper, CFO: Human Capital & Careers (Feb. 1, 2008),  https://www.cfo.com/human-capital-careers/2008/02/worldcom-whistle-blower-cynthia-cooper/. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  This concerns a claim that the Sun paid the partner of a Royal Aide for sensitive briefings and is said to be based on new Whistle Blower information. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
Gauthier, Kumar Belani, Mark Litchy, and David Leaper, “Forced-air warming blowers: An evaluation of filtration adequacy and airborne contamination emissions in the operating room,” 39 Am. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and   Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism  v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Samantha Maddern
In contrast, in The Environmental Group Ltd v Peter Bowd[5], a CEO claimed he was subjected to an investigation into his alleged misconduct, suspended and then sacked because he was a ‘whistle-blower’ – he had raised concerns in a report to the Board, and then lodged a complaint with ASIC, about alleged financial irregularities. [read post]
Leveson, in the preceding paragraph of the ENRC judgment, states that it is “obviously in the public interest that companies should be prepared to investigate allegations from whistle blowers or investigative journalists, prior to going to a prosecutor such as the SFO, without losing the benefit of legal professional privilege for the work product and consequences of their investigation. [read post]