Search for: "State v. Cheek"
Results 21 - 40
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2018, 5:16 pm
The post State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm
A few months ago, this blog featured a discussion on Maryland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Martin v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:42 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Cheeks v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 9:58 am
A divided Supreme Court issued an important opinion today, Maryland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:54 am
On August 7, 2015, in Dorain Cheeks v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:32 pm
See, Roth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
The 2015 ruling was Cheeks v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
The back of his head came into contact with the appellant’s cheek and although at first any injury seemed slight it developed and her injuries were quite serious. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Under Cheek v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
For Friday enjoyment, I post Pirri v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
At booking a few hours later, a police officer requested a cheek swab from Buza under penalty of law. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 10:49 am
I think it might've been thinking Marriott Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Supreme Court's decision in Cheek v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 6:07 pm
That spoiler alert is tongue-in-cheek. [read post]
