Search for: "State v. Churchill" Results 21 - 40 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Churchill was one of its ‘founding fathers’ and the original text was drafted by British MP and lawyer/Nuremberg prosecutor Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In any event, the Appellate Division, citing Foster v Churchill, 87 NY2d 744, concluded  that a qualified privilege attaches to statements made for a supervisory purpose in an employment context. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
 We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
It's in the style of Churchill — "never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never-in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in" — and it's understood emotionally, not literally.We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations, July 4th, 1776. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
State and local governments instated facilities close and industry’s influence strikes again. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm by Stuart Kaplow
While there was no announcement, the worst kept secret at Greenbuild is that USGBC is that the work on LEED v 5 (.. in lieu of v 4.2) will soon commence in earnest. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]