Search for: "State v. Clear" Results 21 - 40 of 51,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Minick Law
In C.K.D. the Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of a DWI based on State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 10:24 am
 To top it all off, we've got People of the State of California v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Name clearing hearingsChang v Department of Educ. of the City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 02018, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [Department] terminated Tzefang Frances Chang’s contract as a bilingual speech pathologist. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Edward Aquilone, a former Executive Director of Personnel for the New York City Board of Education, won a court order in state Supreme Court directing the school board to hold a name-clearing hearing, only to have the order vacated by the Appellate Division.Aquilone retired from his position in 1989. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:49 am
Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another; [2009] WLR(D) 107 “The general rule in construing planning permission which was clear and unambiguous, to have regard only to the permission unless the planning application had been expressly incorporated, applied to outline planning permission. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Ronald Mann
The post Argument analysis: No clear consensus on states’ authority to regulate prescription-drug middlemen appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"To summarize: New York courts have directed "name-clearing hearings" for probationary employees and for employee without tenure who have been "stigmatized" as a result of “State action” and the employer has made such "stigmatizing" information public.What have the courts considered to be stigmatizing? [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Pursley (The University of Toledo College of Law) has posted Penal Deference and Other Oddities in United States V. [read post]
The Clearing House Association, a membership business league comprised of eleven of the largest financial institutions in the United States, is a party to the pending appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”) in Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. [read post]