Search for: "State v. Coy"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2007, 10:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Roger Coy, Jr. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In Mouvement laïque québécois v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:52 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Noye, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 650 (22 March 2011) Whiston- Dew & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 647 (22 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 305 (22 March 2011) Revenue and Customs v Chamberlin [2011] EWCA Civ 271 (22 March 2011) MS (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 306 (22 March… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Bezich v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court on April 17, 2013 issued its opinion in McNeely v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Hak v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:58 pm
Case in point, courtesy of Eugene Volokh: a Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:55 am
The first article Regard québécois sur le projet de Code de droit international privé français (A view from Quebec on the project of a french private international law Code) is authored by Prof. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:37 pm
Coy A. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Mouvement laïque québécois v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
Co. v Utica First Ins. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
By contrast, Judge Smith in dissent, while not using that analogy exactly, gets the point across:"The right of confrontation includes -- indeed, is, at its core -- the right to meet one's accuser face to face (Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012, 1016 [1988]). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:01 am
State U. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
See LaForest v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
0420 (DDB) In re Coy Reece, No. 09? [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The difference in India is that judges are not coy about acknowledging this reality. [read post]
