Search for: "State v. D. Allen"
Results 21 - 40
of 873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 5:26 pm
§2254(d)(2), a federal court may grant a state prisoner habeas relief if his claim was adjudicated on the merits in state court and "resulted in a decision . . . based... [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:05 am
Allen, 07-395) challenging the state's use of a lethal injection [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:56 pm
Because if justice was actually imposed, they'd probably be in jail, rather than simply owing State Farm some costs.Read the whole thing. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
d=1289308. [2] James A. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:08 pm
Para 17-19 of Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation is the next interesting aspect we take up in this post. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
The complaint (full text) in Brookover v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:15 am
In Cascanet v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:05 pm
Allen. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:00 pm
Allen, 07-395) challenging the state’s use of a lethal injection protocol to carry out executions. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Kan. 1984) Allen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am
Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 22-cv-1681 (KMM/JFD) (D. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
This Court need not reach the question whether §2254(e)(1) applies in every case presenting a challenge under §2254(d)(2), see Rice v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:27 am
[ILB - the case is State of Indiana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Public Officers Law §30(1)(d) provides that a public office becomes vacant if the incumbent of such office ceases to be “an inhabitant of the state, or if he be a local officer, of the political subdivision, or municipal corporation of which he is required to be a resident when chosen.... [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 1:58 am
Arthur, Petitioner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
These are the general facts of Shipp v. [read post]
