Search for: "State v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DIST." Results 21 - 40 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
While this may be so, the Fifth District’s puzzling insistence on perpetuating its own poorly reasoned and judicially criticized precedent on this remedies issue is unfortunate, not only as a matter of logic, but experience. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Richard Hunt
Sept. 16, 2020) the Court declined to allow the plaintiff to use the federal courts to evade state efforts to end abusive Unruh Act litigation. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
The litigation is In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation, a multi-district litigation (MDL) proceeding before Judge Jane Triche Milazzo, who sits on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a partially-published, 150-page slip opinion resolving appeals in consolidated cases, and filed February 25, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court decision finding CEQA defects in the 1800-plus page EIR prepared for Kern County’s adoption of an ordinance designed to provide a streamlined, ministerial permitting process for new oil and gas wells in the county. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am by MBettman
On appeal, the Fifth District, in a unanimous opinion, reversed the decision of the trial court. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy opinion filed February 22, and belatedly ordered published on March 25, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging the EIR for a mixed use business and residential project (the “5M Project”) on 4 acres in downtown San Francisco. [read post]