Search for: "State v. Daniel Owens" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Daniel Dupont) apportioned damages in a case involving an asbestos insulator, who smoked heavily, and died of lung cancer. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
  For one thing, Louisiana is the nation’s only civil law state. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Court will hear case of mariner charged with Sarbanes-Oxley records-destruction violation for discarding undersized fish [Jonathan Adler, Eugene Volokh, Daniel Fisher] SCOTUS goes 9-0 for wider patent fee shifting in Octane Fitness v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Michael Akins, No. 105,809 (McPherson)Daniel E. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:16 am by Steve Hall
Wolfe, 31, was convicted in 2002 of hiring Owen Barber IV to kill Daniel Petrole Jr., Wolfe's marijuana supplier, and was sentenced to death. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]