Search for: "State v. David Hodges" Results 21 - 40 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
He stated: “In my judgment, the question as to whether a faculty should be granted to remove the organ must be considered on its own merits and it cannot be the case that its disposal is simply a necessary consequence of the construction of a new fire exit. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am by Jennifer Davis
Hodges. 576 U.S. 644 (2015) United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina; David S. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) as a landmark to be celebrated—but also to be soberly assessed with regard to the social costs and missed opportunities. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Hodges, for instance, it was already the law in 37 states and the District of Columbia.I understand why so many on the left worship the Court—or rather, the myth of the Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, David Bridge and Jessica Foley, both solicitor-advocates within the CMS litigation & arbitration team, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this summer in the matter of Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, which concerned whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Jay J heard a PTR in the slander case of Hodges v Naish (transferred from the Bristol District Registry). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The operator of E-Station, a supplier of EV charging equipment, is seeking $350,000 in general damages as well as aggravated and special damages, his claim filed in the federal court states. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
In 2009, Augustine began to work as a non-testifying expert witness with the Houston, Texas, plaintiffs’ law firm of Kennedy Hodges LLP. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
New York: North Point Press, 2014.Fiordalis, David V., ed. [read post]