Search for: "State v. DeRosa" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Workman, 692 F.3d 1133 (10th Cir. 2012) (wrote opinion) “allowing petitioner’s brother to be questioned after invoking Fifth Amendment privilege was harmless error” DeRosa v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
DeRosa, 413 Pa. 164, 196 A.2d 387, 389–90 (Pa. 1964) Menarde v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]