Search for: "State v. Dinges" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
" If insurers had the audacity to leave, the state has several options to make sure affordable insurance is in place, including requiring the super-profitable auto insurers to offer home insurance, removing wind from the homeowners insurance policy and putting it into a state pool, competitively bid ding large blocks of houses to insurers from around the world and other options. 2009 From Jacksonville (Fla) Times Union (Aug 10, 2009) Politicians and regulators… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
" If insurers had the audacity to leave, the state has several options to make sure affordable insurance is in place, including requiring the super-profitable auto insurers to offer home insurance, removing wind from the homeowners insurance policy and putting it into a state pool, competitively bid ding large blocks of houses to insurers from around the world and other options. 2009 From Jacksonville (Fla) Times Union (Aug 10, 2009) Politicians and regulators… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:20 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Parti Québécois to unveil secular charter Tuesday Testing the climate for worker-choice laws Editorial: Good move on legal expense insurance United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court held that by “sign[ing] a [consent] document, t[aking] a picture of it, and sen[ding] that picture to Baquero,” Berenguela-Alvarado had demonstrated “her subjective intent to allow EICB to remain in the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:42 pm by Kent Scheidegger
A mostly off-topic note on yesterday's apportionment decision, Evenwel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am by Josh Glazov
This chart helps me keep track: Dead Alive Case Circuit Affected States Year Case Circuit Affected States Year Murphy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:45 am by Norm Pattis
In most states, jury selection takes a couple of hours. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am by Venkat
” He submitted a declaration, but the court dings him because the declaration did not state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that its contents were true. [read post]