Search for: "State v. F. B." Results 21 - 40 of 12,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Government is seeking certiorari from Range v. Attorney General, United States, 69 F.4th 96 (3d Cir. 2023) (en banc), which held that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) was unconstitutional as applied to Bryan Range, whose predicate offense was a (1995) conviction for making a false statement to obtain government benefits. See Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Bryan David Range, No. 23-374. The case is to be conferenced tomorrow, November 17, 2023.
16 Nov 2023, 2:01 pm by Darrell Fields
Attorney General, United States, 69 F.4th 96 (3d Cir. 2023) (en banc), which held that 18 U.S.C. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
State v. Nguyen, 165 Wn.2d 428 (2008)
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
Johnson, Justice Richard B. [read post]
Law Office of Scott Lawrence, PLLC - http://waduiatty.com
Saada v Golan, Not Reported in Fed. Rptr., 2021 WL 4824129 (2d Cir.,2021)[Italy][Federal and State Judicial Remedies][ Rule 60(b) motion][Newly discovered evidence][Denied]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
United States v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
United States, 45 F.3d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1995); see also Carney v. [read post]
Federal Civil Practice Bulletin - http://federalcivilpracticebulletin.blogspot.com/
Rule 60(b) and Successive Habeas Petitions
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
In United States v. [read post]
Crime and Consequences - http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/
Saada v Golan, Not Reported in Fed. Rptr., 2021 WL 4824129 (2d Cir.,2021)[Italy][Federal and State Judicial Remedies][ Rule 60(b) motion][Newly discovered evidence][Denied]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
United States v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Mendoza v Silva, 2014 WL 658068 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [ Attorneys Fees] [Clearly inappropriate]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355, 377 (2d Cir.2013); Whallon v. [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Lewis v. Clarke, Docket 15-1500
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, 152 F. 3d 67, 71–72 (CA2 1998); Pine View Gardens, Inc. v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Will B&B preclusion become typical?
19 Jun 2017, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Buzz Seating, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Eleventh Circuit orders en banc hearing on whether “the risk of force clause in 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Sessions v. Dimaya?”
16 May 2018, 5:30 am by David Markus
Should this Court overrule United States v. [read post]
Southern District of Florida Blog - http://sdfla.blogspot.com/
CAFC analyzes FRCP 60(b)(3) in CAP Export
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Casey v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Challenging Sufficient Evidence To Support Other Acts Under FRE 404(b)
27 Oct 2009, 12:52 am
" Turner, _ F.3d at _ (quoting United States v. [read post]
Federal Evidence Review Blog - http://federalevidence.com/blog
Rath v Marcoski, --- F.3d ----, 2018 WL 3799875 (11th Cir., 2018)[Czech Republic] [Necessary expenses]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
§ 9007(b)(3). [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Rath v Marcoski, --- F.3d ----, 2018 WL 3799875 (11th Cir., 2018)[Czech Republic] [Necessary expenses]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
§ 9007(b)(3). [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
New Ninth Circuit class certification opinion: Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
25 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In Meyer v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
Claims Of Jury Racial Bias Were Unreviewable Under FRE 606(b)
20 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Tenth Circuit reinstates conviction after concluding FRE 606(b) exceptions did not apply and Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was not violated; Tenth Circuit notes circuit split on whether allegations of juror misconduct on dishonesty during voir dire may be considered, in United States v. [read post]
Federal Evidence Review Blog - http://federalevidence.com/blog
Case o' The Week: Prior Too Old is Sentencing Gold, United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez
8 Jun 2009, 12:13 am
United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
Obstruction of justice enhancement applies when conduct occurred during prosecution of state charges preceding federal indictment
31 Jul 2007, 5:21 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/
Third Circuit Declines to Weigh in on Split Re Whether Adjustment under Guideline ยง 3E1.1(b) Is Mandatory under Certain Circumstances
9 Jan 2013, 6:23 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
 Compare United States v. [read post]
Split Circuits - http://splitcircuits.blogspot.com/
Proof that Internet was used to download child pornography does not automatically establish that pornographic images moved across state lines
14 Sep 2007, 4:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/