Search for: "State v. Grounds"
Results 21 - 40
of 40,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State for the… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
The post JOHN WESLEY LEE, JR. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:21 pm
Read the opinion The post RONALD JOHN THOMAS v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:45 am
Read the opinion The post JOHN WESLEY LEE, JR. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP171-CR State v. [...] [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:56 am
Regina (Boahen) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2010] EWCA Civ 585; [2010] WLR (D) 143 “An immigration officer at the port of entry had discretionary power to cancel a visa granted overseas on the ground that the purpose of the visit was not same as stated in the visa granted and to refuse leave to enter the UK. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
” Hyatt v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
He was then taken to the ground and handcuffed. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
To be accurate, it would be proper to view irreconcilable differences as a modified no-fault basis of dissolution, because, unlike other states in which true no-fault grounds exist, there are some minimal prerequisites to receiving a judgment under irreconcilable differences. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:21 pm
Droplets v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:26 am
In Murray v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:26 am
The case is State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
United States, covered earlier here, which presents the question: Whether a criminal defendant convicted under a federal statute has standing to challenge her conviction on grounds that, as applied to... [read post]
