Search for: "State v. Hoge"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2007, 10:34 am
By K&L Gates Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 3:28 am
Supreme Court: Vitra v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court of Singapore was the first to refer a question of foreign law to a foreign court (Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) [2009] 2 SLR (R) 166), when it sought a determination of a question of English law. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
When the attorney for Kerri attempted to serve the court order against moving the body on the Washington state funeral home, the body had already been removed. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:32 pm
Yesterday, the ECJ delivered its judgments in cases C-189/08 (Zuid-Chemie BV v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
There was only one hope for Realchemie now: an appeal on a point of law to the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands). [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:52 am
Problems may ensue:"In a recent legal malpractice case, Mattingly v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The decision (which you can access here) is Case C-119/10 (Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
They still do, despite that decision, see the ruling of the Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) on 30th November 2007 in Roche v Primus following the ruling of the ECJ. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
Hoge, 468 A.2d 1380 (Pa. 1983). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
Reference on Art. 1 Brussels I Regulation (C-406/09; Realchemie Nederland BV v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Do those criteria leave room for the criterion developed in Netherlands national law to the effect that there is no longer any question of exhaustion on the sole ground that the reseller has given the reproductions a different form and has disseminated them among the public in that form (judgment of the Hoge Raad of 19 January 1979 in Poortvliet, NJ 1979/412)? [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Dunham v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
Infringement of EU law and the duty of using the legal remedies pursuant to Art. 34 N. 1 Reg. 44 / 2001 The Dutch Hoge Raad in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
The present article analyses the reception of the ECJ cases by courts of the member states. [read post]
