Search for: "State v. Hollister" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Cook County Breast Cancer Lawsuit Receives $1.5 Million Verdict – Estate of Lorraine Hollister v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
JurgensonInsufficient evidenceWhether Jessica's Law is Cruel and Unusual PunishmentImproper admission of hearsayImproper admission of evidence that contains comment on credibilityProsecutorial misconduct (comment of right to remain silent)State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
 Around this time last year he found himself in the Court of Appeal in  Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd - an account of profits case that reversed His Honour Judge Birss QC's (as he then was) decision (see AmeriKat's report on the appeal here). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The implications of the Directive and the changes it has brought still remain unclear and are yet to be fully appreciated as the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hollister v Medik Ostomy [2012] EWCA Civ 1419 made clear." [read post]
23 May 2013, 6:03 am by Joe Patrice
[NBC News] * Elie argues with folks about Greece v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
However, Medik repackaged the products and re-applied Hollister's registered marks for HOLLISTER or DANSAC. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:54 pm
By Matthew Hinks In an opinion containing echoes of the United States Supreme Court's controversial and much maligned decision in Kelo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
Citing Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim KG v Swingward Ltd, it said the appropriate financial remedy should be assessed in the light of the extent of damage caused to Hollister by the infringement, this being assessed in accordance with the principle of proportionality. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]