Search for: "State v. Huntington" Results 21 - 40 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
That case is not affected by today's decision.The Attorney General's appeal in the state case is City of Huntington Beach v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  A v Switzerland, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2018). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
She also stated that the rings were being promoted on signs within the store as Tiffany diamond engagement rings. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employees v Huntington, 2014 NY Slip Op 03271, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublic Officers Law §18*permits a political or civil subdivision of the State whose governing body has agreed by the adoption of local law, by-law, resolution, rule or regulation to “confer the benefits of the section” upon its employees, and (ii) to be held liable for the costs incurred under these provisions including the defense and indemnification its officers and… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:20 am by sally
Supreme Court Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] UKSC 24 (16 June 2010) MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25 (16 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) New Look Retailers Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWCA Crim 1268 (16 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lambert & Ors v Barratt Homes Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 681 (16… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Great job.P.S. - Lest one think that all opinions are like Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:43 am by Layla Kuhl
In The Huntington National Bank v Ristich, the Court of Appeals held “a defendant desiring to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination at the pleading stage of a civil action is not excused from filing a timely answer to the complaint, unless otherwise provided by law. [read post]