Search for: "State v. Illing"
Results 21 - 40
of 12,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 3:18 am
Courts cannot judge specialist policy Regina (Legal Remedy UK Ltd) v. [read post]
Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds 8th Amendment Protection for Mentally-Ill Defendants Facing Execution
28 Jun 2007, 1:52 pm
In Panetti v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:28 pm
Ill. 2009). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
Ill. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:54 pm
States are expected to have systems in place that avoid a real risk of article 3 ill-treatment. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:53 am
In Rancosky v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
The implications of the ill-considered decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 7:53 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
Court Proceedings Perfunctory On August 12, 2015, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
On September 6, 2011, New York State entered into a settlement with Disability Advocates, Inc. in resolution of the federal lawsuit, Joseph S. et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:44 am
MAGNETEK, INC. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:10 am
Quarterman (06-6407), a case that deals with whether the State can execute a man who understands that he is set to receive the death penalty, but, due to his mental illness, is deluded about why the State sought execution. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his home… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]
