Search for: "State v. Illing" Results 21 - 40 of 12,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Isabel McArdle
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:54 pm by Hugh Southey QC, Matrix
States are expected to have systems in place that avoid a real risk of article 3 ill-treatment. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by Calvin Massey
        The implications of the ill-considered decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm by Rachel Marcus
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:14 am by John Floyd
  Court Proceedings Perfunctory   On August 12, 2015, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:40 am by Charles Dunham
On September 6, 2011, New York State entered into a settlement with Disability Advocates, Inc. in resolution of the federal lawsuit, Joseph S. et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:10 am
Quarterman (06-6407), a case that deals with whether the State can execute a man who understands that he is set to receive the death penalty, but, due to his mental illness, is deluded about why the State sought execution. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am by sally
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his home… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am by SHG
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]