Search for: "State v. Isles" Results 21 - 40 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 5:55 am
Contents include:LectureBarton Legum, Of Definitions and Disregard: An Editorial Case CommentsAgora: Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian FederationAndrew Newcombe, Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation: An Introduction to the Agora Tarcisio Gazzini, Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation: Provisional Application of the ECT in the Yukos CaseChristopher S Gibson, Yukos… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” That applies here as well; the Court definitively rejected ISL in the Article I setting twice in the last decade, in Arizona Elected Legislature v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is difficult to see the Supreme Court allowing the appeal, at least on the basis of the case as stated. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am by Michael C. Dorf
Are the bills constitutional in light of the dreaded independent state legislature (ISL) theory that the Supreme Court might endorse in Moore v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:17 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) QFS Scaffolding Ltd. v Sable & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 682 (17 June 2010) Keefe v The Isle of Man Steam Packet Company Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 683 (17 June 2010) Seadrill Management Services Ltd & Anor v OAO Gazprom [2010] EWCA Civ 691 (17 June 2010) Bradley Fold Travel Ltd & Anor v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 695 (18 June 2010) Ministry of Justice v Carter [2010] EWCA Civ 694… [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]