Search for: "State v. Kaplan"
Results 21 - 40
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:21 pm
Kim, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:22 am
The Kaplans, in turn, sued the firm in state court for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:51 am
Member Kaplan’s Dissent Board Member Marvin Kaplan disagreed with the Board’s application of Darlington, and dissented, stating that there was no motive to chill unionism at other company locations based on the evidence adduced before the ALJ, “because the [company] was unaware of ongoing union activity at any other terminal, nor did it believe that union organizing at any other terminal was imminently intended. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:02 am
Twenty years after Joy Silk, in NLRB v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:15 pm
FDA took issue with the representation that there was a 49% observed relative difference in all cause mortality with Breztri v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
Kaplan and David Zaslowsky: “Arbitration. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:33 pm
From Judge Lewis Kaplan's opinion today in Carroll v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 9:21 am
The Board in GM said it would now apply its well-worn test, first set forth in Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 7:12 am
Carroll v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
As Kaplan commented about the Statute: “with the history of the Holocaust being so important to pass on to the next generation, it’s vital that we be transparent and ensure that anyone viewing artwork stolen by the Nazis understand where it came from and its role in history. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
” A court may grant a stay where the determination in one action may dispose or limit issues in a separate action (Uptown Healthcare Mgmt., Inc. v Rivkin Raddler LLP, 116 AD3d 631 [1st Dept 2014]; SSA Holdings LLC v Kaplan, 120 A.D.3d 1111 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:43 pm
Kaplan (1995)] 514 U.S. 938, 944 [contrasting ‘ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts’ with the clear and unmistakable rule].) [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
The case, formally known as Farias v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 12:29 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
Kivett and Cantero v. [read post]
