Search for: "State v. Lewin"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
These factual allegations, as supplemented by plaintiffs’ papers in opposition to defendant attorney’s dismissal motion, sufficiently alleged a legal malpractice claim (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]; Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Lewin (Hawai’i, 1993) and Baker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:55 am
Let’s talk about Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
See IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
See IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Power, Nathan Lewin, Seth P. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
The most intriguing, as the Court heard the case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 7:59 am
In this regard, the Court held -- citing cases in Indiana and Texas (Ortman v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:45 am
The comments occurred during Monday's oral argument in a case on which we posted when it was granted: Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
However, “speculation on future events are insufficient to establish that the defendant lawyer’s malpractice, if any, was a proximate cause of any such loss” (Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734-735 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006] [citations omitted]). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
This speculation is insufficient to establish that defendant’s malpractice, if any, was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s losses (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734-735 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Courts examining this question have concluded temporary absences include court-ordered visitations, In re Lewin, 149 S.W.3d 727, 739 (Tex. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Law, Baehr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:26 pm
In Baehr v. [read post]
