Search for: "State v. List" Results 21 - 40 of 27,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The Pena court, citing City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768, said that only if Pena’s challenge to the list itself was successful would she have a remedy that comports with Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution, in that the original list would have had no legal existence and thus could not have expired, allowing for extension of a 'corrected' list. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:23 am
Among the nine majority opinions (which is more than I've seen in a while - and right before Christmas, too) is State v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
It did not preclude a more general consideration of whether a listed state's laws and practices were Convention compliant, therefore the list system was not incompatible with art 3 of the Convention. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:27 am by Christine Dowling
A few more "re-listed" criminal cases for a second consideration by the Supreme Court.Ryan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:08 pm
United States, No. 07-13; Monette v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to hear oral arguments in November 2024 in Teva v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:25 am by Susan Brenner
On the webpage in which the list appears, TripAdvisor states clearly `Dirtiest Hotels -- United States as reported by travelers on TripAdvisor. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides…Continue reading The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post The… [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
The Court devotes two thirds of its opinion to addressing Young's legal insufficiency claim, and to revisiting the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:57 am by artatlawadmin
On 20 May 2020, the Supreme Court of the UK handed down a judgment considering the categorisation as “listed buildings” of a pair of early 18th century lead urns attributed to the Flemish sculptor John van Nost, in the case of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.[1] The judgment provides… Read More »The Supreme Court considers the issue of Garden Ornaments under the Listed Buildings regime The post… [read post]