Search for: "State v. Million" Results 21 - 40 of 24,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
One Music Specialist work (“Jam the Box”) was interpolated into Flo Rida’s hit song “In the Ayer,” which sold millions of copies and reached No. 9 on the Billboard chart. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am by Tobin Admin
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
Those are treated as compensation and can yield a W-2 with millions of dollars of income on it. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
It also found that the proxy statement failed to disclose the first advisor’s fees for prior work for members of Nordic’s equity consortium, which amounted to nearly $400 million in the relevant two-year period. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
 There may be a million other people watching the same movie at the same time, but the deaf person will never see, smell or touch them. [read post]