Search for: "State v. Napier" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
The Locomotive Inspection Act did not itself contain a preemption clause, but an 85-year-old precedent, Napier v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by William A. Ruskin
  Some commentators have sought to isolate the case from other preemption jurisprudence by arguing that the outcome of the case may have been different  if the Court did not feel bound by the precedent established in a 1926 Supreme Court case, Napier v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:07 am by Shon Hopwood
The district court agreed, and the Third Circuit affirmed, invoking the Supreme Court’s holding in Napier v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
The Court held that petitioners’ state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims fall within the field of locomotive equipment regulation pre-empted by the Locomotive Inspection Act, as that field was defined in Napier v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Rosalind English
All of the HMP Albany claims were made following publicity of the decision in Napier v The Scottish Ministers in April 2004, in which the Court of Session in Scotland held that the conditions at HMP Barlinnie (which included regular slopping out) breached the pursuer’s Article 3 rights. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am by Shon Hopwood
” The key disagreement between the parties is whether the Court’s 1926 decision in Napier v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:49 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Vannes KFT v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1466 (20 December 2010) Chester v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1439 (17 December 2010) Autoweld Systems Ltd v Kito Enterprises LLC [2010] EWCA Civ 1469 (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 3344 (Ch) (17 December 2010) … [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
   Claims for injunctions failed at the first hurdle in Napier v Pressdram Limited [2010] 1 WLR 934 CA and Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am by INFORRM
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
See In re Napier, 55 F.3d 610, 613 (Fed. [read post]