Search for: "State v. Proctor" Results 21 - 40 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
On 25 January 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Forensic Risk Ltd v Akisanya (KB-2022-004582). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State”: Jed Stiglitz’s book The Reasoning State makes the case that the legislature commits problems to the administrative state, which attains its legitimacy through reasoning and competition. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:46 am by Jeremy Telman
Cleveland State contracts with Respondus and Honorlock to provide proctoring services for tests... [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
Under the heading “competing interests,” the authors state that “they have no competing interests. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  The meeting heard impassioned speeches from Sir Cliff Richard, Paul Gambaccini and Harvey Proctor – all falsely accused of such offences in the past. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:29 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Max Brown Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by admin
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by Schachtman
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]