Search for: "State v. Public Employees Retirement Bd." Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Forfeiture of employee's retirement contributions made to a New York State public retirement system United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
I returned also with a desire to reflect, in a public writing, on the experience – an unaccustomed sensation, because my usual public writing style is, to put it charitably, highly technical, heavily footnoted, and wholly impersonal. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:29 pm by Evan M. Levow
Most public employees in New Jersey at the state, county, and city levels are eligible to participate in pension funds established under state law. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The comptroller executed payroll deductions for dues from State employees who were members of the AEA and the ASEA. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Payment of vacation leave accruals upon separation from employment Bolin v Nassau County Bd. of Coop. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The First Amendment does not protect public employees from adverse employment decisions based on communications they make pursuant to their official duties, see Weintraub v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
An organisation that prevents the slaughter of retired racehorses, Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation, is suing a lawyer for defamation in New York, after he represented one of the foundation’s donors, in Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
This dichotomy is illustrated by, for example, the fact that PSU employees are included within the definition of 'state employees' under the State Employees' Retirement Code, 71 Pa.C.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Her husband had retired unmarried under the Civil Service Retirement System and elected to receive an annuity payable during his lifetime with no survivor benefits. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]