Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 21 - 40
of 21,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 6:50 am
Ever since the June 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:01 am
Wayfair, upheld South Dakota's sales tax on out-of-state sellers against a Commerce Clause (or, more precisely, Dormant Commerce Clause) challenge. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:48 am
Pelkey that federal law does not preempt a plaintiff's state law claim against a towing company for the illegal sale of his car. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:50 am
In the wake of the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:08 am
” Celanese Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am
In view of the now well-known United States Supreme Court South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:21 pm
The case is Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
” The visitor was referring to the motion for summary judgment hearing in the sales and use tax refund lawsuit styled Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
Washington v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:40 pm
In a recurring classic example, Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Many have lauded the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corp v North Dakota that states cannot collect sales tax from businesses unless that business had a physical presence within the state. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
See State of Tennessee v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:33 pm
In a closely watched 5 to 4 decision authored by retiring Justice Kennedy in South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:37 am
Largent Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Christopher v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
Implicated in Costco v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
Finally, a commercialoffer for sale made by a foreign entity that isdirected to a United States customer at its place of businessin the United States may serve as an invalidingactivity. [read post]
16 May 2005, 12:17 pm
Heald, striking down (by a 5-4 majority) state laws that ban direct sales to consumers by out-of-state wineries while permitting direct sales by in-state wineries, on the ground that such laws violate the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
