Search for: "State v. Sullivan & Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Sullivan: Clarified rules for conflicts of interests when a defense attorney is representing multiple clients, finding that defendant need only show that the attorney’s conduct adversely affected him. 1980 United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith tossed previous filings when Miller asked if the sovereign citizen’s group could replace his lawyers. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Wallace Tashima's opinion (joined by Judges Milan Smith and Jacqueline Nguyen) in Miller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The lawyer for Ben Roberts-Smith says his client is desperate to clear his name in an open court in his long awaited defamation trial against three former Fairfax newspapers continues to be hampered by national security concerns raised by the attorney general. [read post]