Search for: "State v. Sussex" Results 21 - 40 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2007, 8:25 pm
Sussex I State Prison Defendants -Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-100 Defendant ORDER Appellant filed an application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a motion to place this case in abeyance and enjoin appellees from executing him on October 17, 2007, pending decision by the United States Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:15 am by INFORRM
“Publishers and their legal teams will fear that yesterday’s victory for the Duchess of Sussex is a leap towards a judge made privacy law” ran The Times article the day after Mr Justice Warby granted Summary Judgment in Meghan’s case against the Mail on Sunday (HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspaper Limited [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch)). [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On 25 to 27 April 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Grant v NGN and Duke of Sussex NGN before Fancourt J. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Hacked Off reminds readers that the Leveson system is not “state approved”. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
Sonja Fagernäs, Department of Economics, University of Sussex, has posted Protection Through Proof of Age: Birth Registration and Child Labor in Early 20th Century USA. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Therefore the central issue in both the cases under appeal was the interpretation and application of the statutory incompatibility ground of decision identified in the majority judgment in the Supreme Court in R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Hacked Off had a press release “Summary judgment issued in Duchess of Sussex v The Mail (Associated Newspapers)”. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day Fancourt J handed down judgment following the consequentials hearing in The Duke of Sussex v MGN. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:55 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miskovic & Anor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 16 (20 January 2011) Swain- Masonn & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2011] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2011) Rohlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 18 (20 January 2011) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2011) Crema v Cenkos Securities Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 10 (20 January 2011) … [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:12 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) King, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 376 (27 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC B1 (QB) (26 March 2012) Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd (t/a Medirest) v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 781 (QB) (28 March 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SMP Trustees Ltd, Re [2012] EWHC 772 (Ch) (27 March 2012) High Court (Family… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Now it is over, the case of the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited must stand as a monument to the newspaper group’s extraordinary capacity to deny reality. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]