Search for: "State v. Target Stores, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2018, 10:58 am
’ ” (Kraft, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
City of Detroit[12] and Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:13 pm
In Billingsley v Citi Trends, Inc, a federal district court in Alabama declined to compel arbitration of the store managers’ claims where the retailer rolled out the arbitration agreement after litigation commenced and which specifically targeted only potential class members with the goal of undercutting the collective action. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
”The Commission strongly disagreed with the view that if it allowed a defendant to deny the complaint’s substantive allegations that the settlement would not be in the public interest.The complaint is United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
The Gap, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:52 am
Affirming summary judgment for the defendants, the California appeals court in an unpublished opinion explained that the prior robbery was not enough to show that a premeditated murder was foreseeable (Bhandari v. 7-Eleven, Inc., January 9, 2018, Baker, L.). [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:01 am
The case is titled T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
On May 20, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided whether an action instituted by the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia on behalf of the citizens of West Virginia against CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kmart Holding Corp., The Kroger Co., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreen Co. and Target Stores, Inc. was a class action, removable under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 10:53 am
In Prachasaisoradej v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Smarte Carte, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Smarte Carte, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:15 am
A shopper in a state with a sales tax must pay that at the time of the purchase from an in-state store, and the store then passes on the tax revenue to the state. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
UPS Store, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Target case (which this court did cite), where the court held that Target's obligations to comply with the ADA in its offline retail stores extended to its website. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Story County (Iowa) District Court Judge Dale Ruigh last week ruled in Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:42 am
In FM Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
” (citingGraham v. [read post]
