Search for: "State v. Waterhouse" Results 21 - 40 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Phillips doesn’t mention that case, but he does try to reconcile his reading with Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:51 pm by Josh Blackman
His understanding of Title VII was governed by Justice Brennan's plurality decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:31 am by Josh Blackman
In particular, Justice Gorsuch relied indirectly on Justice Brennan's plurality decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
The Court continued its work on this topic in the celebrated case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Davis II Chair in Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Peter M. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 8:33 am by Charlotte Garden
It focuses on Congress’ response to the court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by Brett Holubeck
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) to determine “[w]hether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
The second is that sexual orientation discrimination is unlawful sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:31 am by Tim Zubizarreta
This case asked whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people either inherently as being transgender or under the sex stereotyping decision in the earlier Price Waterhouse v. [read post]