Search for: "State v. Westgate"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
I expect to see this issue come up very soon indeed.Congratulations to Martin Westgate QC and Ben Chataway for the tenant for this case. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
I expect to see this issue come up very soon indeed.Congratulations to Martin Westgate QC and Ben Chataway for the tenant for this case. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
In the Secretary of State’s view, qualification criteria form part of an allocation scheme. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
As regards the discretionary housing payments, Counsel for CPAG (Martin Westgate, who did a really fantastic job here and overall) argued that Westminster Council had already commented that such payments would only cover a small number of affected households.Supperstone J rejected these grounds as well. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
As regards the discretionary housing payments, Counsel for CPAG (Martin Westgate, who did a really fantastic job here and overall) argued that Westminster Council had already commented that such payments would only cover a small number of affected households.Supperstone J rejected these grounds as well. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
Jordan Office Building 650 West State Street P.O. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
