Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Justice Breyer joined Justice John Paul Stevens, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice David Souter in expressly rejecting ISL in 2000, but has kept quiet about the idea since then. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Department of Justice, and then became an assistant U. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
The lawsuit swiftly attracted the attention of the Department of Justice. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
A Justice Department spokesperson declined comment. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 12:06 pm
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
Not much came of either move: A judge dismissed the seditious conspiracy case, and the Justice Department never charged any protesters with seditious conspiracy. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
In an opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment did require Padilla's lawyer to tell Padilla that his conviction for drug distribution made him subject to automatic deportation. -- To discuss the case, we have United States Military Academy at West Point Department of Social Sciences Professor Margaret D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Dellinger, Partner, O'Melveny & Myers; former Acting Solicitor General of the United States (for Petitioner) Steven G. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
Steven Radjenovich v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:25 am
United States, 2009 WL 3650874 (Ct. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
United States, 556 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm
For now, business method patents live on, and United States patent law remains mostly unchanged by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:45 am
Scores of advocacy groups have lined up on each side of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
States. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
In his dissent in Gross v. [read post]
