Search for: "Stills v. Superior Court of California" Results 21 - 40 of 1,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 8:02 am by Dennis Crouch
The court relies on Mexicali Rose v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm by The White Law Group
Lawsuit filed against Independent Financial Group and Rep Shawn Davis March 2019 – A civil lawsuit was filed involving Independent Financial Group and its registered representative, Shawn Davis (CRD#: 2911230) in the Superior Court of the State of California requesting unspecified damages founded on allegations that false or misleading statements had been made concerning a business development company, real estate security, equipment leasing products and direct… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
” The state can still regulate these activities, but the court says it must do so with a “constitutional scalpel to meet the confines of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Then in October 2022, police said, DePape, broke into Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home and bludgeoned her husband when she was still House speaker. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Interpreter fees are addressed in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 9795.3. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court correctly affirmed the trial court and two lessons come out of this. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
However, the trial court abused its discretion by disqualifying the Firm’s attorneys from representing the Firm in all pretrial phases of the litigation without making any findings as to how their continued behind-the-scenes activities preceding trial would undermine the purposes of the advocate-witness rule.'” “It was Stanislaus Superior Court Judge John D. [read post]