Search for: "Stone v. Thomas et al" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Markus and Ji, Mason and Shao, Huijie, Surveying the Impact of China’s New (and Toothy) Data Privacy Laws on the WeChat Generation of Employees (ABA Criminal Justice Section Newsletter) ( 2023), University of Colorado School of Law Fagundes, Dave and Contreras, Jorge L., Private Ownership of Public Facts: Docudramas, Deals, and Life Story Rights (2023) UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming Yildirim, Emine Ozge and Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer and Lazarova, Ana and Vézina, Brigitte,… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog)   Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Biogen et al (CAFC 2006-1634, -1649) precedential; Judges Rader (chiming in), Newman (author), Moore (dissent) The three patents contain a total of 230 claims. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lee et al., An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 Ariz. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]