Search for: "Strong v. K & K INVESTMENTS, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
  They are sold based on insignificant tax or insurance benefits by registered representatives with strong financial incentives adverse to those of their clients. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Class V stock was a publicly traded “tracking stock” that tracked the performance of VMware, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
As for financing, Dow had $9 billion from PIC, $4 billion from Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and the Kuwait Investment Authority, and a $13 billion bridge loan (available to be drawn upon if the ROH merger closed before K-Dow closed even though Dow’s position publicly was that the ROH merger was not contingent upon the closing of K-Dow). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
For SEC registered investment advisers who are adding cryptocurrencies to their fund investment programs and for cryptocurrency focused fund managers who may be relying on SEC exemptions from registration, the need to understand the regulatory implication of certain practices is of utmost importance. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
For SEC registered investment advisers who are adding cryptocurrencies to their fund investment programs and for cryptocurrency focused fund managers who may be relying on SEC exemptions from registration, the need to understand the regulatory implication of certain practices is of utmost importance. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
For publication opinions today (2): In MJ Acquisitions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In early 2020, President Trump signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act (a/k/a SECURE Act 1.0) into law. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And that is, when you combine charismatic leaders with strong investor interest, noncompliance, weak controls, or under-empowered gatekeepers, it creates a perfect storm of risk and the potential for great investor harm. [read post]