Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Here is the list:i) Tickle Me Elmo; (ii) Beanie Babies; (iii) Silly Bandz; (iv) Pet Rocks; (v) Tamagotchi; (vi) Cabbage Patch Kids; (vii) OGs; (viii) Furby; ix) Bratz Dolls; and (x) the Rubik's Cube An impressive list of improbably commercially successful toys, but in this Kat's eyes, one of them stands out: the success of the Pet Rock in the mid-1970’s. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:57 pm
    -  Bryant left Mattel to become a consultant for MGA, and MGA turned the Bratz dolls into a billion dollar success. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
Quinn argued that Larian, too, personally gained nearly $800 million in stock value and distributions flowing from the success of the dolls. ... [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:42 pm by Barry Barnett
So a 9-0 Supreme Court held today in Bowman v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:14 pm by Gordon Firemark
An 8-person jury unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that Mattel did not own the rights to the Bratz dolls, early models or sketches; and said that MGA did not steal trade secrets.ew trial. 9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law Larry Montz, et al v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
Just last year, the company unveiled a succession of continually cheaper and smaller iPod models like Russian nesting dolls. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 7:32 pm
  Famous Original Ray's Licensing Corp. v. [read post]