Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
"  Defendant Shasta Technologies appealed from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting LifeScan Scotland a preliminary injunction. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:17 am by Lewis Craft
  United States Patent No. 8,083,593 was issued on December 27, 2011, and describes the implementation of a DVR system allowing for the recording of media, including television programs. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
However, in aneffort to respect the presumption against theextraterritorial application of United States law, themajority erroneously declines to consider WesternGecoL.L.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
On February 13, 2008, United States District Court Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong appointed Gwyn Jones, a U.K. citizen that resides in Cyprus, as the lead plaintiff in a securities class action brought against BigBand Networks, Inc., its directors and officers, and other defendants. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Continental Circuits LLC (claim construction) Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 19, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in e.Digital Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Various legal changes from the 1980s onwards in the United States have been identified as responsible for making the American legal climate friendlier to patent holders, which in turn has spurred more applications. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am by John Bellinger, Andy Wang
Cisco, a suit filed by a group of Chinese dissidents against Cisco Systems, the California-based Internet technology provider, and its CEO, John Chambers, for allegedly aiding and abetting the arbitrary detention and torture of the plaintiffs by the Chinese Government. [read post]