Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2012, 6:35 pm
Don’t make us pay the price of protecting competitors. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Herrington: the bar for entry into consumer class actions is also going up. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
Nov. 30, 2020) The post Section 230 Protects Amazon from Manufacturer’s Ad Copy–Brodie v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
The court kept the consumer protection claims alive. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
What the average consumer is; consumer as subject v. object of TM law. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
But regardless, we do get a more 3D picture of the consumer in the false advertising cases because of the concept of materiality: TM law structurally isn’t set up to offer this thicker account of consumer decisionmaking. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Finally, we have West Virginia, which didn’t need no stinkin’ safe harbors to exempt all FDA-approved products from its state’s consumer protection statutes. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 8:21 am
Patel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Didn’t find anything in Arkansas.CaliforniaIf we didn't find anything here, we'd probably have given up, but most populous state in the nation came through. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
It’s often not rational to read the contract, since most terms won’t end up mattering. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:13 pm
In their recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 7:26 am
Aug. 9, 2022) The post California Anti-SLAPP Law Doesn’t Protect Negative Patient Review of Doctor–Premier Brain & Spine v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:00 pm
(We don't make this stuff up. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
To get up to speed on the major provisions of Title X, I listened to a briefing entitled Dodd-Frank Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Creation of a New Federal Regulator. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
But, according to a recent court ruling, contractors who don’t register as a licensed Home Improvement Contractor (HIC) could face serious liability under the state Consumer Protection Act (Chapter 93A) in any dispute with a homeowner. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:40 am
AT&T Mobility: “Good News for Consumers” Per FTC Chairman The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules en banc in FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
McKinstry v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:38 pm
Fisher’s article one of the best I’ve seen in discussing the potential practical impact that the Supreme Court’s recent class arbitration waiver decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
