Search for: "T. QUILLEN"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 1:36 am
Qin Shi does talk about Quillen. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:41 am
The Yale authors apparently didn't read 4 CHI. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 1:06 am
This discussion began with papers of Quillen and Webster that suggested that the grant rate might be as high as 97% and more reasonably is at least 85%. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:06 am
With Quillen and Webster's ramblings as a baseline, he couldn't miss. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:46 am
NASA didn’t even exist. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 1:51 am
Separately, as noted previously on IPBiz, the 2008 Emory "Rubber Stamp" didn't cite Quillen/Webster's THIRD paper (published in 2006) or commentary thereon, published in JPTOS in 2006. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
L.J. 727, 754 (2002).The interesting part is that Thomas says something about the 97% patent grant rate that Quillen and Webster didn't really say. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
[citing to Parchomovsky (but not mentioning co-author Polk Wagner), 154 U Penn L Rev 1 and then citing to Cecil Quillen (but not mentioning co-author Webster), specifically the FIRST Quillen/Webster paper, 11 Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Quillen also opined that the private bar would not do it. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 5:17 pm
I fell out of my chair when I heard the size of his patent filing budget compared to Intel's research budget, and he said that he wasn't even counting the litigation budget. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:00 am
Former state Supreme Court Justice William T. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:24 am
I don’t know where Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:13 am
There just wasn't a lot of prior art at the time, and it was hard to search, and so we got more patents.This is borne out by the technology differences. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
He doesn't deny the study was fraudulent, but claims Flamm defamed him by persisting. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:27 pm
A rambling story by John Schmid and Ben Poston titled Patent rejections soar as pressure on agency rises includes the text:"We're the ones who put ‘no' in innovation," goes a joke that circulates in the agency's corridors, according to an examiner who requested anonymity because the agency won't let examiners speak with reporters.At the same time, because of heavy turnover, the staff of examiners became younger and… [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
IAM (Joff Wild) didn't think so, but then went off on a tangent, as if the words Quillen/Webster were not in the vocabulary:Essentially none of this is much of a surprise. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:51 am
")Prior art may not be in Wegner's vocabulary.One recalls that Wegner was involved in the Quillen/Webster business:If one looks at the second paper of Quillen and Webster (wherein the 97% grant figure is "qualified", 12 Fed. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
The Dreyfuss article did not mention the patent quality discussion of Quillen and Webster, although Jaffe and Lerner did refer to the Quillen and Webster thinking within Chapter 5 (page 142). [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
eBay ignored later modifications by Quillen and Webster AND criticisms of the entire Quillen and Webster approach. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
