Search for: "T.D. v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Farmers, like other business owners, may deduct “ordinary and necessary expenses paid . . . in carrying on any trade or business. [read post]
  Farmers, like other business owners, may deduct “ordinary and necessary expenses paid . . . in carrying on any trade or business. [read post]
Conservation Active farmers may be able to presently deduct the cost of conservation practices implemented as part of an NRCS-approved (or comparable state) plan. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 2d 1345, 1367 (S.D.Fla.2011), aff’d, Chapman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:58 am by Robert C. Weill
Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass’n, SC10-2292; T.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:58 am by Robert C. Weill
Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass’n, SC10-2292; T.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
Speaking on the fall-out from Damache the Minister for Justice, Alan Shatter T.D. [read post]