Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:05 pm
WP Company LLCDecision Date: December 24, 2020 The single judge bench of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted Washington Post’s motion of dismissal in the complaint filed by Representative Devin G. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
Khan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 10th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits hold. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 8:39 pm
Supreme Court: Taylor v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
The Case Law Taylor Made Software Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 9:06 pm
In the decision, the Board explains that satisfying one of the Taylor v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
” (Frew v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
District Court for the District of Columbia considered—and rejected—President George W. [read post]
