Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 21 - 40 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:05 pm by INFORRM
WP Company LLCDecision Date: December 24, 2020 The single judge bench of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted Washington Post’s motion of dismissal in the complaint filed by Representative Devin G. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 10th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits hold. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 9:06 pm by Scott McKeown
In the decision, the Board explains that satisfying one of the Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
District Court for the District of Columbia considered—and rejected—President George W. [read post]